OpenAI Aftermath

Main Page: Difference between revisions

From OpenAI Aftermath
Aftermath bot (talk | contribs)
Link the new Campana–Peternell page
Aftermath bot (talk | contribs)
Main Page: link the new page on the singular set of stationary integral varifolds
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 31: Line 31:
** [[Positive lower density of large prime gaps]]
** [[Positive lower density of large prime gaps]]
** [[A quadratic bound for Jacobsthal's function]]
** [[A quadratic bound for Jacobsthal's function]]
** [[Squarefree values of quartics and power-free values of polynomials]]
** [[The inhomogeneous Duffin–Schaeffer conjecture]]
** [[The inhomogeneous Duffin–Schaeffer conjecture]]
** [[Hilbert's tenth problem over the rational numbers]]
** [[Hilbert's tenth problem over the rational numbers]]
Line 75: Line 76:
** [[Worst-case Subset Sum below the meet-in-the-middle bound]]
** [[Worst-case Subset Sum below the meet-in-the-middle bound]]
** [[Sensitivity versus block sensitivity]]
** [[Sensitivity versus block sensitivity]]
** [[The Gopalan–Servedio square-root degree conjecture]]
** [[Depth-three circuit lower bounds beyond the square-root exponent]]
** [[Depth-three circuit lower bounds beyond the square-root exponent]]
** [[The Gotsman–Linial conjecture]]
** [[The Gotsman–Linial conjecture]]
Line 87: Line 89:
** [[Classifying spaces and geometric obstructions for Artin groups]]
** [[Classifying spaces and geometric obstructions for Artin groups]]
** [[Thompson's group F is nonamenable]]
** [[Thompson's group F is nonamenable]]
** [[Infinite finitely presented simple amenable groups]]
** [[Dixmier's unitarizability problem]]
** [[Dixmier's unitarizability problem]]
** [[Kaplansky's zero-divisor conjecture]]
** [[Kaplansky's zero-divisor conjecture]]
Line 184: Line 187:
* Complex analysis:
* Complex analysis:
** [[Brennan's conjecture]]
** [[Brennan's conjecture]]
** [[Koebe's circle-domain conjecture]]
** [[Kobayashi's canonical-ampleness conjecture]]
** [[Kobayashi's canonical-ampleness conjecture]]
** [[The Oka property of complex K3 surfaces]]
** [[The Oka property of complex K3 surfaces]]
Line 194: Line 198:
** [[Ultraflat real Littlewood polynomials]]
** [[Ultraflat real Littlewood polynomials]]
** [[Sogge's local smoothing conjecture in three dimensions]]
** [[Sogge's local smoothing conjecture in three dimensions]]
** [[The Bochner–Riesz conjecture in three dimensions]]
** [[The David–Semmes problem in higher codimension]]
** [[The David–Semmes problem in higher codimension]]
** [[Fourier extension for positively curved surfaces in three dimensions]]
** [[Fourier extension for positively curved surfaces in three dimensions]]
Line 200: Line 205:
** [[The hyperinvariant subspace problem]]
** [[The hyperinvariant subspace problem]]
** [[The Lang–Plaut problem]]
** [[The Lang–Plaut problem]]
** [[The GNRS conjecture for planar and bounded-treewidth graphs]]
** [[Metric Markov cotype of ℓ1]]
** [[Metric Markov cotype of ℓ1]]
** [[The complete Crouzeix conjecture]]
** [[The complete Crouzeix conjecture]]
Line 241: Line 247:
** [[Infinitely many closed geodesics on Riemannian spheres]]
** [[Infinitely many closed geodesics on Riemannian spheres]]
** [[Donaldson's tamed-to-compatible conjecture]]
** [[Donaldson's tamed-to-compatible conjecture]]
** [[The singular set of stationary integral varifolds]]
* Mathematical physics:
* Mathematical physics:
** [[Mass generation in two-dimensional O(n) models]]
** [[Mass generation in two-dimensional O(n) models]]

Latest revision as of 00:43, 26 October 2026

OpenAI Aftermath is a guide to mathematical research published by OpenAI and to publicly available follow-up work by others: extensions, applications, formal verifications, corrections and critiques.

How entries are written

  • Each result page summarizes the published claim and cites its public source: the paper, the repository commit or the preprint version.
  • Follow-up work is listed with its relation to the original result (extension, use, verification, correction or critique), its public date and its public status.
  • The publication of a paper, code or a formal proof is reported as such. It is not presented as independent verification.

Browse

Collection-wide checks

  • Formal-statement review. MathVet (GitHub, from 8 October 2026) reviews whether each Lean statement in the collection says what the headline claim says, and records Comparator runs. It states that it does not claim any theorem false.
  • Second-kernel replay. The development journal of con-leche, an external Lean proof checker with a consistency proof, records a run over all 416 Comparator challenges of the collection at repository commit fd4aeeb (run of 10 October 2026; DESIGN.md, tasks #348 and #352–#354). Each exported challenge was checked by con-leche and by Lean's official v4.34.1 kernel, with a one-hour time limit and a 25 GB memory limit. Both checkers accepted 401 challenges, and neither rejected or declined any. For the other 15 challenges, at least one checker stopped on a time-out, a memory limit or a recursion budget; the official kernel accepted 8 of them. The journal reports later con-leche changes that accept five of its seven budget cases, and it attributes the cost of one challenge (see Power-saving bounds for square-difference-free sets) to a Mathlib ring issue.
  • Audit of the manuscripts without Lean. JJardine919/openai-math-audit (Lattice24; archived at Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.23422995) reports a referee-style review, by AI review agents with independent refutation passes for major findings, of all 547 manuscripts in the collection that have no Lean formalization, completed on 16 October 2026. It reports no gap found in 544 of them, a critical gap in the holomorphicity proof of Square-lattice FK interfaces and nested loops for 1 ≤ q < 4 (inherited by one dependent manuscript; see Conformal invariance of square-lattice random-cluster interfaces), and a verifiability gap in The maximum number of mutually unbiased bases in dimension six, whose computer proof cites code and run records that are not in the public release. Every review is published, and the audit invites corrections through repository issues.

Sources