OpenAI Aftermath

Main Page: Difference between revisions

From OpenAI Aftermath
Aftermath bot (talk | contribs)
Link the new Koebe circle-domain page under complex analysis
Aftermath bot (talk | contribs)
Renamed local smoothing page and new Exponential Time Hypothesis page
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 76: Line 76:
** [[Worst-case Subset Sum below the meet-in-the-middle bound]]
** [[Worst-case Subset Sum below the meet-in-the-middle bound]]
** [[Sensitivity versus block sensitivity]]
** [[Sensitivity versus block sensitivity]]
** [[The Gopalan–Servedio square-root degree conjecture]]
** [[Depth-three circuit lower bounds beyond the square-root exponent]]
** [[Depth-three circuit lower bounds beyond the square-root exponent]]
** [[The Gotsman–Linial conjecture]]
** [[The Gotsman–Linial conjecture]]
Line 85: Line 86:
** [[Moore's parity conjecture for constant-depth quantum circuits]]
** [[Moore's parity conjecture for constant-depth quantum circuits]]
** [[The computational complexity of Weisfeiler–Leman refinement]]
** [[The computational complexity of Weisfeiler–Leman refinement]]
** [[The Exponential Time Hypothesis]]
* Group theory:
* Group theory:
** [[Classifying spaces and geometric obstructions for Artin groups]]
** [[Classifying spaces and geometric obstructions for Artin groups]]
Line 128: Line 130:
* Mathematical logic:
* Mathematical logic:
** [[Rigidity of the Turing degrees]]
** [[Rigidity of the Turing degrees]]
** [[Shelah's eventual categoricity conjecture]]
** [[The Barendregt–Geuvers–Klop conjecture]]
** [[The Barendregt–Geuvers–Klop conjecture]]
** [[The Partition Principle and the Axiom of Choice]]
** [[The Partition Principle and the Axiom of Choice]]
Line 196: Line 199:
** [[The Kakeya conjecture in three and four dimensions]]
** [[The Kakeya conjecture in three and four dimensions]]
** [[Ultraflat real Littlewood polynomials]]
** [[Ultraflat real Littlewood polynomials]]
** [[Sogge's local smoothing conjecture in three dimensions]]
** [[Sogge's local smoothing conjecture]]
** [[The Bochner–Riesz conjecture in three dimensions]]
** [[The Bochner–Riesz conjecture in three dimensions]]
** [[The David–Semmes problem in higher codimension]]
** [[The David–Semmes problem in higher codimension]]
Line 246: Line 249:
** [[Infinitely many closed geodesics on Riemannian spheres]]
** [[Infinitely many closed geodesics on Riemannian spheres]]
** [[Donaldson's tamed-to-compatible conjecture]]
** [[Donaldson's tamed-to-compatible conjecture]]
** [[The singular set of stationary integral varifolds]]
* Mathematical physics:
* Mathematical physics:
** [[Mass generation in two-dimensional O(n) models]]
** [[Mass generation in two-dimensional O(n) models]]

Latest revision as of 17:11, 26 October 2026

OpenAI Aftermath is a guide to mathematical research published by OpenAI and to publicly available follow-up work by others: extensions, applications, formal verifications, corrections and critiques.

How entries are written

  • Each result page summarizes the published claim and cites its public source: the paper, the repository commit or the preprint version.
  • Follow-up work is listed with its relation to the original result (extension, use, verification, correction or critique), its public date and its public status.
  • The publication of a paper, code or a formal proof is reported as such. It is not presented as independent verification.

Browse

Collection-wide checks

  • Formal-statement review. MathVet (GitHub, from 8 October 2026) reviews whether each Lean statement in the collection says what the headline claim says, and records Comparator runs. It states that it does not claim any theorem false.
  • Second-kernel replay. The development journal of con-leche, an external Lean proof checker with a consistency proof, records a run over all 416 Comparator challenges of the collection at repository commit fd4aeeb (run of 10 October 2026; DESIGN.md, tasks #348 and #352–#354). Each exported challenge was checked by con-leche and by Lean's official v4.34.1 kernel, with a one-hour time limit and a 25 GB memory limit. Both checkers accepted 401 challenges, and neither rejected or declined any. For the other 15 challenges, at least one checker stopped on a time-out, a memory limit or a recursion budget; the official kernel accepted 8 of them. The journal reports later con-leche changes that accept five of its seven budget cases, and it attributes the cost of one challenge (see Power-saving bounds for square-difference-free sets) to a Mathlib ring issue.
  • Audit of the manuscripts without Lean. JJardine919/openai-math-audit (Lattice24; archived at Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.23422995) reports a referee-style review, by AI review agents with independent refutation passes for major findings, of all 547 manuscripts in the collection that have no Lean formalization, completed on 16 October 2026. It reports no gap found in 544 of them, a critical gap in the holomorphicity proof of Square-lattice FK interfaces and nested loops for 1 ≤ q < 4 (inherited by one dependent manuscript; see Conformal invariance of square-lattice random-cluster interfaces), and a verifiability gap in The maximum number of mutually unbiased bases in dimension six, whose computer proof cites code and run records that are not in the public release. Every review is published, and the audit invites corrections through repository issues.

Sources