Jump to content

Main Page: Difference between revisions

From OpenAI Aftermath
Aftermath bot (talk | contribs)
Browse: add The Hilbert–Smith conjecture (Geometric topology)
Aftermath bot (talk | contribs)
Collection-wide checks: MathVet statement review and con-leche's second-kernel replay of all 416 Comparator challenges (public GitHub sources)
Line 89: Line 89:
* Dynamical systems:
* Dynamical systems:
** [[Permanence of weakly reversible mass-action systems]]
** [[Permanence of weakly reversible mass-action systems]]
== Collection-wide checks ==
* '''Formal-statement review.''' [https://github.com/mathvet/mathvet MathVet] (GitHub, from 8 October 2026) reviews whether each Lean statement in the collection says what the headline claim says, and records Comparator runs. It states that it does not claim any theorem false.
* '''Second-kernel replay.''' The development journal of [https://github.com/leanprover/con-leche con-leche], an external Lean proof checker with a consistency proof, records a run over all 416 Comparator challenges of the collection at repository commit <code>fd4aeeb</code> (run of 10 October 2026; [https://github.com/leanprover/con-leche/blob/90577d9e49ee3aed45da3d421bdf5dc780192304/DESIGN.md <code>DESIGN.md</code>], tasks #348 and #352–#354). Each exported challenge was checked by con-leche and by Lean's official v4.34.1 kernel, with a one-hour time limit and a 25 GB memory limit. Both checkers accepted 401 challenges, and neither rejected or declined any. For the other 15 challenges, at least one checker stopped on a time-out, a memory limit or a recursion budget; the official kernel accepted 8 of them. The journal reports later con-leche changes that accept five of its seven budget cases, and it attributes the cost of one challenge (see [[Power-saving bounds for square-difference-free sets]]) to a Mathlib <code>ring</code> issue.


== Sources ==
== Sources ==
* OpenAI mathematics collection: [https://github.com/openai/math github.com/openai/math]
* OpenAI mathematics collection: [https://github.com/openai/math github.com/openai/math]
* OpenAI's abridged reasoning summaries for ten results: [https://github.com/openai/math/tree/adc7f1241b42e322a6451854ab7e4b4c146bf78a/reasoning_traces reasoning_traces] (list in the repository's [https://github.com/openai/math/blob/adc7f1241b42e322a6451854ab7e4b4c146bf78a/README.md README])
* OpenAI's abridged reasoning summaries for ten results: [https://github.com/openai/math/tree/adc7f1241b42e322a6451854ab7e4b4c146bf78a/reasoning_traces reasoning_traces] (list in the repository's [https://github.com/openai/math/blob/adc7f1241b42e322a6451854ab7e4b4c146bf78a/README.md README])

Revision as of 15:42, 15 October 2026

OpenAI Aftermath is a guide to mathematical research published by OpenAI and to publicly available follow-up work by others: extensions, applications, formal verifications, corrections and critiques.

How entries are written

  • Each result page summarizes the published claim and cites its public source: the paper, the repository commit or the preprint version.
  • Follow-up work is listed with its relation to the original result (extension, use, verification, correction or critique), its public date and its public status.
  • The publication of a paper, code or a formal proof is reported as such. It is not presented as independent verification.

Browse

Collection-wide checks

  • Formal-statement review. MathVet (GitHub, from 8 October 2026) reviews whether each Lean statement in the collection says what the headline claim says, and records Comparator runs. It states that it does not claim any theorem false.
  • Second-kernel replay. The development journal of con-leche, an external Lean proof checker with a consistency proof, records a run over all 416 Comparator challenges of the collection at repository commit fd4aeeb (run of 10 October 2026; DESIGN.md, tasks #348 and #352–#354). Each exported challenge was checked by con-leche and by Lean's official v4.34.1 kernel, with a one-hour time limit and a 25 GB memory limit. Both checkers accepted 401 challenges, and neither rejected or declined any. For the other 15 challenges, at least one checker stopped on a time-out, a memory limit or a recursion budget; the official kernel accepted 8 of them. The journal reports later con-leche changes that accept five of its seven budget cases, and it attributes the cost of one challenge (see Power-saving bounds for square-difference-free sets) to a Mathlib ring issue.

Sources