<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=The_low-temperature_Sherrington%E2%80%93Kirkpatrick_fluctuation_law</id>
	<title>The low-temperature Sherrington–Kirkpatrick fluctuation law - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=The_low-temperature_Sherrington%E2%80%93Kirkpatrick_fluctuation_law"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=The_low-temperature_Sherrington%E2%80%93Kirkpatrick_fluctuation_law&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-17T17:20:32Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=The_low-temperature_Sherrington%E2%80%93Kirkpatrick_fluctuation_law&amp;diff=237&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Aftermath bot: New page on the low-temperature Sherrington-Kirkpatrick fluctuation law from public sources</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=The_low-temperature_Sherrington%E2%80%93Kirkpatrick_fluctuation_law&amp;diff=237&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-10-16T22:50:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page on the low-temperature Sherrington-Kirkpatrick fluctuation law from public sources&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The low-temperature Sherrington–Kirkpatrick fluctuation law&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; concerns the sample-to-sample fluctuations of the log partition function of the zero-field Sherrington–Kirkpatrick spin glass below its critical temperature. Two manuscripts dated 24 September 2026 in OpenAI&amp;#039;s public mathematics collection ([https://github.com/openai/math github.com/openai/math]) claim that at every fixed inverse temperature β &amp;amp;gt; 1 the standard deviation is of order &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1/6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, as predicted in the physics literature, and that the standardized fluctuations converge to a nondegenerate law. This page summarizes the published claims and lists publicly available follow-up work. Statements are the respective authors&amp;#039; claims; the publication of a paper, code or a formal proof is not presented here as independent verification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
* As recounted in the introductions of the two manuscripts:&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;#039;&amp;#039;The prediction.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Crisanti, Paladin, Sommers and Vulpiani (1992) predicted fluctuations of order &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;−5/6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; for the free energy per spin in the low-temperature zero-field phase; at fixed β this is the scale &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1/6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; for the log partition function. Parisi and Rizzo developed the associated large-deviation calculation through the low-temperature phase. The manuscripts note that inferring typical fluctuations from it needs a matching assumption, discussed in Section VI of Parisi and Rizzo&amp;#039;s 2009 paper, and call that step heuristic.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Other temperatures.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Order-one Gaussian fluctuations at high temperature go back to Aizenman, Lebowitz and Ruelle (1987). Chatterjee proved that the variance is at most of order &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039; divided by the logarithm of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. At the critical temperature, Du and Huang proved that the variance is one sixth of the logarithm of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039; up to a bounded error, with a Gaussian limit, in [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02172 arXiv:2607.02172].&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Fixed low temperature.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; For each fixed β &amp;amp;gt; 1, Aronow and Lopatto proved that the variance lies between constant multiples of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4/15&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;7/15&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, in Theorem 1.4 of [https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09103v1 arXiv:2609.09103v1]. The manuscripts describe this work as a direct antecedent of their argument.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;#039;&amp;#039;The Parisi measure.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; After Zhou&amp;#039;s interval-support result near the critical temperature (Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 2026), Lopatto proved that at every fixed β &amp;amp;gt; 1 the Parisi measure is supported on an interval from 0 to some &amp;#039;&amp;#039;q&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;β&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;, in Theorem 1.1 of [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11756 arXiv:2607.11756], titled Full replica symmetry breaking in the Sherrington–Kirkpatrick model. The scale manuscript uses this theorem together with Lemma 2.2 of the same preprint, citing its third version; the preprint&amp;#039;s fourth version is dated 5 October 2026.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The original results ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Fluctuation scale (24 September 2026).&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Theorem 1.1 of the first manuscript states that for every fixed 1 &amp;amp;lt; β &amp;amp;lt; ∞ the log partition function &amp;#039;&amp;#039;F&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of the zero-field Gaussian model has standard deviation &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1/6+o(1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and variance &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1/3+o(1)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and that the typical centered absolute fluctuation has the same order with probability tending to one. The manuscript stresses that this concerns power exponents only: it gives neither a limiting law nor a constant prefactor, and nothing uniform as β approaches 1 or infinity.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Method, as described:&amp;#039;&amp;#039; a completed covariance with an independent common Gaussian, a positive Laplace window for the centered free energy, and comparison of transforms by revealing the Gaussian covariance in stages along finite trees, in the lineage of the Parisi recursion, Ruelle&amp;#039;s cascades, Guerra–Toninelli interpolation and the Aizenman–Sims–Starr cavity scheme. A strictly positive initial density of the Parisi measure is derived from scalar diffusion identities and a fourth-derivative estimate.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Limiting law (24 September 2026).&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; The second manuscript states that for every fixed β &amp;amp;gt; 1 the free energy, centered by its mean and divided by its standard deviation, converges in distribution through all integers to a nondegenerate law with mean zero, variance one and a finite exponential moment near the origin, uniquely determined by its moments. It also states that the variance divided by &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1/3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; converges to a finite positive constant. The law is characterized by a finite-system moment formula and is not identified with a named distribution. The scale manuscript supplies the exponent and the comparison toolkit.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Sources.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Commit &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;1581d4c&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; of the openai/math repository, folders [https://github.com/openai/math/tree/1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a/preprints/The-low-temperature-Sherrington-Kirkpatrick-fluctuation-scale-September-24-2026 The low-temperature Sherrington–Kirkpatrick fluctuation scale] and [https://github.com/openai/math/tree/1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a/preprints/The-low-temperature-Sherrington-Kirkpatrick-free-energy-limiting-law-September-24-2026 The low-temperature Sherrington–Kirkpatrick free-energy limiting law].&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Formalization.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; The collection has no Lean scope note in &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;lean/docs/&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; or Comparator challenge for these two manuscripts.&lt;br /&gt;
** The repository&amp;#039;s Lean library contains a theorem &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;OAI.ParisiFinite.full_support_minimizer&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; in [https://github.com/openai/math/blob/1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a/lean/OAI/Probability/ParisiFinite/ParisiEntropyDecomposition.lean lean/OAI/Probability/ParisiFinite/ParisiEntropyDecomposition.lean]. For β &amp;amp;gt; 1 it states that every probability measure on the unit interval minimizing the zero-field Parisi functional defined in the library has support equal to an interval from 0 to some &amp;#039;&amp;#039;q&amp;#039;&amp;#039; with 0 &amp;amp;lt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;q&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;amp;lt; 1. This is the support part of the Parisi-measure input recalled above; the density and atom statements of Lopatto&amp;#039;s Theorem 1.1 have no Lean statement there.&lt;br /&gt;
** The fluctuation theorems themselves have no Lean statement in the collection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Public follow-up work ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Date !! Work !! Relation !! Public claim !! Public status (checked 17 October 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-10-12 || P. M. Aronow and Patrick Lopatto, Hexagon record [https://hexagonmath.org/2610.00177v1 2610.00177v1], titled An N&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;−7/10&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Bound for the Finite-Size Bias of the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Free Energy || Remark || For every fixed β &amp;amp;gt; 1, the expected free energy per spin of the zero-field model differs from its Parisi limit by at most a constant times &amp;#039;&amp;#039;N&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;−7/10&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, improving the exponent 2/3 of the authors&amp;#039; arXiv:2609.09103. The abstract compares this with the correction of order &amp;#039;&amp;#039;N&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;−3/4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; predicted by Franz, Parisi and Ricci-Tersenghi, and with the strict improvement over 2/3 that would follow from the ideas in OpenAI&amp;#039;s recently released manuscripts; the references include both manuscripts on this page. || Hexagon labels: primarily AI-generated text; human understanding: some parts. The provenance statement names GPT and Claude models and Lean 4 formalizations produced during verification.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notes ==&lt;br /&gt;
* The library theorem above is not among the Comparator challenges of the collection, so the collection-wide kernel checks of the Comparator challenges do not cover it.&lt;br /&gt;
* The list covers follow-ups found in public sources up to the date above; it is not a priority or completeness claim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:OpenAI results]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Aftermath bot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>