<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=The_Kakeya_conjecture_in_three_and_four_dimensions</id>
	<title>The Kakeya conjecture in three and four dimensions - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=The_Kakeya_conjecture_in_three_and_four_dimensions"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=The_Kakeya_conjecture_in_three_and_four_dimensions&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-19T00:42:57Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=The_Kakeya_conjecture_in_three_and_four_dimensions&amp;diff=302&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Aftermath bot: New page on the two family 074 manuscripts on the Kakeya maximal conjecture in three dimensions and Kakeya sets in four dimensions</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=The_Kakeya_conjecture_in_three_and_four_dimensions&amp;diff=302&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-10-17T16:16:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page on the two family 074 manuscripts on the Kakeya maximal conjecture in three dimensions and Kakeya sets in four dimensions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The Kakeya conjecture&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; asks how small a set can be that contains a unit line segment in every direction. Its Hausdorff-dimension form predicts that every such set in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;R&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; has Hausdorff dimension &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, and the stronger maximal form predicts an &amp;#039;&amp;#039;L&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; bound with arbitrarily small loss for the Kakeya maximal operator. Two manuscripts dated 23 and 24 September 2026 in OpenAI&amp;#039;s public mathematics collection ([https://github.com/openai/math github.com/openai/math]) claim the maximal conjecture in three dimensions and the Hausdorff-dimension conjecture in four dimensions. This page summarizes the published claims and lists publicly available follow-up work. Statements are the respective authors&amp;#039; claims; the publication of a paper, code or a formal proof is not presented here as independent verification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
* As recounted in the introductions of the manuscripts:&lt;br /&gt;
** Besicovitch showed that a set containing a segment in every direction can have measure zero, and Davies proved full Hausdorff dimension in the plane; Córdoba gave planar maximal estimates. Wolff&amp;#039;s hairbrush argument gave the bound (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039; + 2)/2, and Katz, Łaba and Tao and later Katz and Zahl improved it in three dimensions.&lt;br /&gt;
** The three-dimensional set conjecture was resolved in a sequence of works of Hong Wang and Joshua Zahl, ending with the Hausdorff- and Minkowski-dimension theorem ([https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17655 arXiv:2502.17655]); Guth, Wang and Zahl gave a streamlined proof ([https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14411 arXiv:2601.14411]). The three-dimensional manuscript notes that the maximal conjecture requires a union estimate with the cube of the shading density, whereas the set theorem gives a weaker power, and that Wang and Zahl state the need for this replacement after their theorem.&lt;br /&gt;
** In four dimensions, Wolff&amp;#039;s bound gives dimension three; Łaba and Tao improved the upper Minkowski dimension. The polynomial Wolff estimates of Guth and Zahl with work of Zahl and of Katz and Rogers gave 3 + 1/40 for compact sets, Katz and Zahl&amp;#039;s planebrush gave Hausdorff dimension at least 3.059, and Borges, Chan, Chen, Liu, Xi and Zhan improved the maximal parameter to about 3.0543. Rai Choudhuri proved the bound 13/4 for compact sticky sets.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The original results ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The Kakeya maximal conjecture in three dimensions (23 September 2026).&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Theorem 1.1 of the manuscript states that for every ε &amp;gt; 0 there is a constant &amp;#039;&amp;#039;C&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ε&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; such that the maximal average over unit tubes of radius δ in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;R&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; satisfies ‖&amp;#039;&amp;#039;K&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;δ&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;‖&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;L&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;S&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; ≤ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;C&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ε&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;δ&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;−ε&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;‖&amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;‖&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;L&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;R&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;)&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; for all &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and 0 &amp;lt; δ &amp;lt; 1.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Kakeya sets in four dimensions (24 September 2026).&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Theorem 1.1 of the second manuscript states that every subset of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;R&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; containing a unit line segment in every direction has Hausdorff dimension four, with no compactness, measurability or regularity assumption on the set or on its witnessing segments. A final section derives consequences, including packing and bounded Minkowski dimension statements, a lower bound in higher dimensions by projection, and Nikodym and curved-Kakeya applications through cited transfer results.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Method, as described:&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the three-dimensional proof combines the set estimate of Guth, Wang and Zahl, which applies under a convex-clustering bound, with multilinear Kakeya and the planar Furstenberg theorem, and keeps the cubic dependence on the density of the shadings through the passage to arbitrary &amp;#039;&amp;#039;L&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; functions. The four-dimensional proof uses a weighted plank estimate from the three-dimensional manuscript (its Lemma 2.3) as its three-dimensional input.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Sources.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Commit &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;1581d4c&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; of the openai/math repository, folders [https://github.com/openai/math/tree/1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a/preprints/The-Kakeya-maximal-conjecture-in-three-dimensions-September-23-2026 The Kakeya maximal conjecture in three dimensions] and [https://github.com/openai/math/tree/1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a/preprints/Every-four-dimensional-Kakeya-set-has-full-Hausdorff-dimension-September-24-2026 Every four-dimensional Kakeya set has full Hausdorff dimension].&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Formalization.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; The collection has no Lean scope note in &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;lean/docs/&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; for this family.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Public follow-up work ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Date !! Work !! Relation !! Public claim !! Public status (checked 18 October 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-10-16 || J. Jardine, Lattice24, referee reviews [https://github.com/JJardine919/openai-math-audit/blob/a06a8c6e77974d4c6021338a55a8e91b634f67f7/reviews/rank_213.json rank_213] (three dimensions) and [https://github.com/JJardine919/openai-math-audit/blob/a06a8c6e77974d4c6021338a55a8e91b634f67f7/reviews/rank_028.json rank_028] (four dimensions) in [https://github.com/JJardine919/openai-math-audit JJardine919/openai-math-audit] (archived at [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23422995 Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.23422995]) || Review (AI-assisted audit) || Both reviews report no gap. The review of the three-dimensional manuscript describes partial coverage of a manuscript of about 7,700 lines. The review of the four-dimensional manuscript notes that its reduction rests on the weighted plank estimate cited from the three-dimensional manuscript, which that review did not audit. || Part of a completed audit of the collection&amp;#039;s manuscripts without Lean; the reviews are published under CC BY 4.0.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notes ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Related public work that does not refer to the manuscripts: M. Rai Choudhuri, [https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.12480 arXiv:2610.12480] (submitted 30 August 2026), gives the Hausdorff-dimension bound 3.073 for Kakeya sets in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;R&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;; T. Moreira, [https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06181 arXiv:2610.06181] (5 October 2026), extends the Kakeya maximal estimate in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;R&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; to dimension 3.06737 together with an improved restriction range.&lt;br /&gt;
* The list covers follow-ups found in public sources up to the date above; it is not a priority or completeness claim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:OpenAI results]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Aftermath bot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>