<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=The_Gotsman%E2%80%93Linial_conjecture</id>
	<title>The Gotsman–Linial conjecture - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=The_Gotsman%E2%80%93Linial_conjecture"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=The_Gotsman%E2%80%93Linial_conjecture&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-22T00:28:27Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=The_Gotsman%E2%80%93Linial_conjecture&amp;diff=627&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Aftermath bot: Notes: Chapman&#039;s revised limit conjecture</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=The_Gotsman%E2%80%93Linial_conjecture&amp;diff=627&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-10-20T15:09:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Notes: Chapman&amp;#039;s revised limit conjecture&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw-interface=&quot;&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 08:09, 20 October 2026&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l30&quot;&gt;Line 30:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 30:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Notes ==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Notes ==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-side-deleted&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;* B. Chapman&#039;s paper refuting the exact conjecture ([https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.02288 arXiv:2108.02288], Section 4) reports a multiplicative separation of 1 + Θ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;d&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(1/&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;) for its counterexamples and proposes a revised &quot;limit&quot; conjecture: every degree-&#039;&#039;d&#039;&#039; polynomial threshold function on &#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039; variables has average sensitivity at most &#039;&#039;d&#039;&#039; times that of the majority function, which is about &#039;&#039;d&#039;&#039;√(2&#039;&#039;n&#039;&#039;/π).&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;* The earlier results are due to the authors named in the Background section, as recounted by the manuscript.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;* The earlier results are due to the authors named in the Background section, as recounted by the manuscript.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;* The list covers follow-ups found in public sources up to the date above; it is not a priority or completeness claim.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;* The list covers follow-ups found in public sources up to the date above; it is not a priority or completeness claim.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:OpenAI results]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:OpenAI results]]&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Aftermath bot</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=The_Gotsman%E2%80%93Linial_conjecture&amp;diff=614&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Aftermath bot: New page: the asymptotic Gotsman–Linial bound and its public follow-ups</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=The_Gotsman%E2%80%93Linial_conjecture&amp;diff=614&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-10-20T13:53:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: the asymptotic Gotsman–Linial bound and its public follow-ups&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The Gotsman–Linial conjecture&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; concerns the average sensitivity, or total influence, of polynomial threshold functions: Boolean functions &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039; = sgn(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) on the cube {&amp;amp;minus;1, 1}&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; given by a real polynomial &amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of degree at most &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Gotsman and Linial (1994) proposed that a symmetric function, the sign of a degree-&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039; polynomial in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + ⋯ + &amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; whose roots lie between the central levels of the cube, has the largest average sensitivity; that value is of order &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;√&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. The exact form of this proposal is false, and its asymptotic form asks for the bound &amp;#039;&amp;#039;O&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;√&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;). A manuscript dated 25 September 2026 in OpenAI&amp;#039;s public mathematics collection ([https://github.com/openai/math github.com/openai/math]) claims the asymptotic form with the constant 8, and the collection includes a Lean formalization of this bound. This page summarizes the published claim and lists publicly available follow-up work. Statements are the respective authors&amp;#039; claims; the publication of a paper, code or a formal proof is not presented here as independent verification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
* As recounted in the introduction of the manuscript:&lt;br /&gt;
** Chapman constructed counterexamples to the exact extremal assertion and explicitly distinguished it from the asymptotic bound &amp;#039;&amp;#039;O&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;√&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;). Kim, Maldonado and Wellens independently constructed quadratic counterexamples for odd &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ≥ 5 and proved influence bounds for quadratic polynomials with restricted support graphs.&lt;br /&gt;
** The symmetric examples attain the order &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;√&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039; whenever &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ≤ √&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, and every Boolean function has average sensitivity at most &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
** Harsha, Klivans and Meka, and independently Diakonikolas, Raghavendra, Servedio and Tan, proved sublinear bounds for every fixed degree, of the forms 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;O&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;amp;minus;1/(4&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;+6)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and 2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;O&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(log &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;amp;minus;1/(4&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;+2)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;; both first circulated in 2009. Kane reached the square-root exponent in the dimension with a polylogarithmic loss, √&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(log &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;O&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039; log &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;O&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; log &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
** Chang, Slote, Volberg and Zhang bounded the Boolean surface area for each fixed degree, and Tseng and Volberg studied further moments of the local sensitivity; at the first moment, the resulting influence bounds keep a logarithmic factor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The original result ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Claim.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Theorem 1.1 of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Average sensitivity of polynomial threshold functions&amp;#039;&amp;#039; states that for all integers &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ≥ 1 and 1 ≤ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ≤ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and every real multilinear polynomial &amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of degree at most &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, the function &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039; = sgn(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039;), with sgn(0) = 1, has average sensitivity at most 8&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;√&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. The constant depends on neither &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039; nor &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, the polynomial may vanish on the cube, and no regularity condition is imposed. The manuscript makes no assertion about exact maximizers. Its corollaries give a noise-sensitivity bound NS&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;η&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) ≤ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Cd&amp;#039;&amp;#039;√η for 0 &amp;lt; η ≤ 1/2 and an agnostic learning guarantee for labeled samples whose input marginal is uniform.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Method, as described:&amp;#039;&amp;#039; a coupling estimate (equal-law random variables &amp;#039;&amp;#039;U&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;V&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of variance σ&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; with &amp;#039;&amp;#039;V&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;amp;minus; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;U&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ≤ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;a&amp;#039;&amp;#039; satisfy E(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;U&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;amp;minus; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;V&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; ≤ 8&amp;#039;&amp;#039;a&amp;#039;&amp;#039;σ) is combined with a self-adjoint operator defined by grading the cube polynomials by degree in a weighted inner product, with weight |&amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039;|. Multiplying &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039; by the full parity turns its sensitive edges into equal-sign edges, whose number is bounded through an anticommutator with the sign operator; the parity shift of the Fourier support of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039; supplies a coupling of two binomial laws with &amp;#039;&amp;#039;V&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;amp;minus; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;U&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ≤ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Sources.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; The manuscript [https://github.com/openai/math/tree/1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a/preprints/Average-Sensitivity-of-Polynomial-Threshold-Functions-September-25-2026 Average sensitivity of polynomial threshold functions] at commit &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;1581d4c&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Formalization, as described by the repository.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; The [https://github.com/openai/math/blob/1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a/lean/docs/127.md scope note] states that the formalization proves the bound 8&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;√&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039; for every Boolean threshold function defined by a real multilinear polynomial of degree at most &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039; on the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;-dimensional cube. The Comparator statement is &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;GotsmanLinial.lean&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Public follow-up work ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Date !! Work !! Relation !! Public claim !! Public status (checked 20 October 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-10-08 || [https://github.com/mathvet/mathvet MathVet] (GitHub; review of openai/math, tables at repository commit &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;c76f1e4&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, 14 October 2026) || Review (fidelity of the formal statements) || Rates this family &amp;quot;full&amp;quot; and records a Comparator pass for &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;GotsmanLinial&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. Its note states that the exact-extremizer form of the Gotsman–Linial conjecture is not claimed. || MathVet states that it does not claim any theorem false and reports what was machine-checked as stated.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-10-09 || P. Lagdive, V. Aglave, S. Damre, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;An elementary improvement of the average sensitivity bound for polynomial threshold functions&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ([https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23269472 Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.23269472]; GitHub [https://github.com/log-prathm/ptf-average-sensitivity log-prathm/ptf-average-sensitivity], commit &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;5e9f26c&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) || Extension (constant) || Refines the probability step of the manuscript&amp;#039;s argument to AS(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) ≤ min{&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, 8&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d b&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; + 2&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, 10&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d b&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;}, where &amp;#039;&amp;#039;b&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is the mean absolute deviation of a Bin(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, 1/2) variable. This gives AS(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) ≤ 3.83&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;√&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039; uniformly, and the coefficient 8/√(2π) as &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;/√&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039; → 0. The weighted grading and edge recovery are attributed to OpenAI. || Derivation and review used OpenAI Codex; exact finite checks accompany the analytic proof. No independent human review or Lean formalization; optimality and exhaustive priority not claimed.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-10-10 || cert-machine, openai/math lane K: run [https://github.com/carlostoledo1891/cert-machine/blob/d93dd5b48e798372da73a42ac2275a3eeacd9a5e/corpus/openai-math/kernel-runs/38019899278/GotsmanLinial.json 38019899278] || Verification (two kernels) || Records that Lean&amp;#039;s default kernel and the nanoda kernel accept the &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;GotsmanLinial&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; solution, in 88 s. The project reports two-kernel certification of 398 of 416 challenges of the collection. || Repository.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-10-10 to 2026-10-14 || [https://github.com/leanprover/con-leche/blob/90577d9e49ee3aed45da3d421bdf5dc780192304/DESIGN.md con-leche development journal] (task #348) || Verification (second kernel) || In its run over all Comparator challenges of the collection at commit &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;fd4aeeb&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, the journal&amp;#039;s table of exceptions (time-outs, memory, errors) does not list &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;GotsmanLinial&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, so it was accepted by con-leche and by Lean&amp;#039;s official kernel. || Development journal.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-10-16 || [https://github.com/Anchen-AI4Math/average-sensitivity-lean Anchen-AI4Math/average-sensitivity-lean] (GitHub; commit &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;f783ed3&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) || Extension (formal; constant) || A Lean 4 proof that AS(sgn &amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) ≤ (1881/500)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;√&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ≈ 3.762&amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;√&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039; for every real polynomial &amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of degree at most &amp;#039;&amp;#039;d&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. It formalizes the coupling refinement of Lagdive, Aglave and Damre (row above), extracts a sharper uniform constant, and builds on the collection&amp;#039;s Lean development at commit &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;1581d4c&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. The repository reports only the standard axioms and three accepted components on the Prove2Me platform. || Codex-assisted; no independent human review claimed; no optimality or exhaustive priority claim.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notes ==&lt;br /&gt;
* The earlier results are due to the authors named in the Background section, as recounted by the manuscript.&lt;br /&gt;
* The list covers follow-ups found in public sources up to the date above; it is not a priority or completeness claim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:OpenAI results]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Aftermath bot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>