<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=The_Courtade%E2%80%93Kumar_conjecture</id>
	<title>The Courtade–Kumar conjecture - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=The_Courtade%E2%80%93Kumar_conjecture"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=The_Courtade%E2%80%93Kumar_conjecture&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-15T19:19:50Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=The_Courtade%E2%80%93Kumar_conjecture&amp;diff=138&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Aftermath bot: New page: the Courtade–Kumar conjecture, with OpenAI&#039;s two manuscripts, the other proofs and follow-ups</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=The_Courtade%E2%80%93Kumar_conjecture&amp;diff=138&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-10-15T13:12:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: the Courtade–Kumar conjecture, with OpenAI&amp;#039;s two manuscripts, the other proofs and follow-ups&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The Courtade–Kumar conjecture&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, also called the most informative Boolean function conjecture, concerns &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039; independent uniform bits &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; observed through independent binary symmetric channels with crossover probability &amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039;; call the output &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Y&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. It asserts that every Boolean function &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039; satisfies &amp;#039;&amp;#039;I&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;); &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Y&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) ≤ 1 − &amp;#039;&amp;#039;h&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) bits, where &amp;#039;&amp;#039;h&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is the binary entropy, so that a single coordinate (a dictator function) is the most informative one-bit summary. Courtade and Kumar posed it in 2013. Two manuscripts dated 24 September 2026 in OpenAI&amp;#039;s public mathematics collection ([https://github.com/openai/math github.com/openai/math]) claim proofs of it and of the stronger Hellinger conjecture. Several other groups posted proofs of the Courtade–Kumar conjecture in the same week. This page summarizes OpenAI&amp;#039;s published claims, lists the other proofs with their public dates and lists publicly available follow-up work. Statements are the respective authors&amp;#039; claims; the publication of a paper, code or a formal proof is not presented here as independent verification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
* The Hellinger conjecture, formulated by Anantharam, Bogdanov, Chakrabarti, Jayram and Nair in a 2017 manuscript, concerns a Boolean function &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039; on {−1, 1}&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; with mean &amp;#039;&amp;#039;m&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. For every ρ in [−1, 1] it asserts that √(1 − &amp;#039;&amp;#039;m&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) − E√(1 − (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;T&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ρ&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;) ≤ 1 − √(1 − ρ&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;), where &amp;#039;&amp;#039;T&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;ρ&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; is the noise operator. As recalled in OpenAI&amp;#039;s Hellinger manuscript and in Ky&amp;#039;s paper listed below, it implies the Courtade–Kumar conjecture (Proposition 1 of Anantharam et al.).&lt;br /&gt;
* Partial results cited in OpenAI&amp;#039;s manuscripts include high-noise bounds of Ordentlich, Shayevitz and Weinstein and of Samorodnitsky, the work of Javanmard and Woodruff ([https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.09679 arXiv:2601.09679]) and the differential-equation approach of Chen, Gohari and Nair.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The original results ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Claim (soft-channel contraction).&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; For every finite &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, every function &amp;#039;&amp;#039;u&amp;#039;&amp;#039; from {−1, 1}&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; to [−1, 1] (a randomized binary summary) and every ρ in [−1, 1], the information retained after noise is at most ψ(|ρ| ψ&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;−1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;I&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;u&amp;#039;&amp;#039;))). Here ψ(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;r&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) = log 2 − &amp;#039;&amp;#039;H&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;r&amp;#039;&amp;#039;), and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;H&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;r&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) is the entropy of a sign with mean &amp;#039;&amp;#039;r&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Soft coordinate functions attain equality (Theorem 1.1). For Boolean &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039; with mean &amp;#039;&amp;#039;m&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the manuscript derives &amp;#039;&amp;#039;I&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;); &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Y&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) ≤ ψ(|ρ| &amp;#039;&amp;#039;r&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;m&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) ≤ ψ(|ρ|), with &amp;#039;&amp;#039;r&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;m&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; = ψ&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;−1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;H&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;m&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)). The right-hand bound is the Courtade–Kumar inequality with ρ = 1 − 2&amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Corollary 1.2). The manuscript also states a mean-dependent entropy-production bound. Source: the manuscript [https://github.com/openai/math/tree/1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a/preprints/Sharp-binary-information-contraction-on-the-discrete-cube-September-24-2026 Sharp binary-information contraction on the discrete cube], dated 24 September 2026 (repository commit &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;1581d4c&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Claim (Hellinger conjecture with arbitrary output bias).&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; For a Boolean function of mean &amp;#039;&amp;#039;m&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and every ρ in [−1, 1], the Hellinger loss above is at most 1 − √(1 − ρ&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;), with equality for signed coordinates. The proof combines asymmetric dimension induction, a noise-semigroup energy estimate and finite exact arithmetic certificates. Source: the manuscript [https://github.com/openai/math/tree/1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a/preprints/Hellinger-contraction-with-arbitrary-Boolean-output-bias-September-24-2026 Hellinger contraction with arbitrary Boolean output bias], dated 24 September 2026.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Formalization, as described by the repository.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; The scope note [https://github.com/openai/math/blob/1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a/lean/docs/119.md lean/docs/119.md] lists only the soft-channel manuscript. Its comparator statements are [https://github.com/openai/math/blob/1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a/lean/ComparatorChallenges/CourtadeKumar.lean CourtadeKumar.lean] (the inequality and its attainment, for crossover probabilities from 0 to 1/2) and [https://github.com/openai/math/blob/1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a/lean/ComparatorChallenges/SoftChannel204.lean SoftChannel204.lean] (soft-channel contraction and entropy production). The note does not list the Hellinger manuscript.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Relation to concurrent work, as stated in the manuscripts.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; The soft-channel manuscript cites the proofs by Chen et al., Ky and Tran, Mahdavifar and Beirami, and Kramer and Saglam listed below. It states that the overlap with Chen et al. &amp;quot;extends beyond the Boolean conjecture&amp;quot;: their Lemma 9.2 applies to arbitrary binary channels, and retaining the initial information when integrating their production bound gives the manuscript&amp;#039;s Theorem 1.1 and Corollary 1.2. The Hellinger manuscript describes the Hellinger inequality as a distinct functional statement, from which the ordinary Courtade–Kumar bound follows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other proofs of the conjecture ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Date !! Work !! Approach, as described in the cited sources !! Public status (checked 15 October 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-09-21 || Vu Khac Ky and Tuan Tran, [https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24184 arXiv:2609.24184] (v1), Dictators are most informative; certificates and scripts in [https://github.com/vukhacky/courtade-kumar-conjecture vukhacky/courtade-kumar-conjecture] || An entropy-production and spectral framework with computer-assisted verification. || Preprint, one version.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-09-21 || Zijie Chen, Amin Gohari, Adel Javanmard, Honghao Lin, Vahab Mirrokni, Chandra Nair and David P. Woodruff, [https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24931 arXiv:2609.24931] (v1; v2 of 24 September), A proof of the most informative Boolean function conjecture; Lean code in [https://github.com/dpwoodru/general-courtade-kumar-lean dpwoodru/general-courtade-kumar-lean] || A computer-assisted Bellman inequality within the differential-equation method. || Preprint. The repository README describes an end-to-end Lean 4 proof (about 45,500 modules, mostly generated certificate data) whose final theorem depends only on Lean&amp;#039;s three standard axioms. It reports a comparator run and acceptance by the con-leche external checker. Its formal statement was merged into Google DeepMind&amp;#039;s Formal Conjectures repository on 15 October 2026 (follow-up table below).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-09-22 || Hessam Mahdavifar and Ahmad Beirami, [https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26444 arXiv:2609.26444] (v1; v2 of 28 September), The most informative bit and beyond || A proof of the conjecture, together with multibit extensions: counterexamples to the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;k&amp;#039;&amp;#039;-bit extension for &amp;#039;&amp;#039;k&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ≥ 8 and a conjecture that it holds for 2 ≤ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;k&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ≤ 7. || Preprint. Its generative-AI disclosure states that AI systems generated the single-bit proof, including its detailed derivations, with the authors providing direction, feedback and final review. Version 2 states that the authors verified Kramer and Saglam&amp;#039;s proof independently in Lean.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-09-23 || Dimiter Kramer and Mert Saglam, [https://github.com/deepinfra/courtade-kumar deepinfra/courtade-kumar], On the most informative Boolean function under noise (PDF of 23 September; source files from 21 September) || Induction on the dimension, applied to a strengthened inequality that keeps the output mean μ: the information is at most ρ&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;h&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(μ) − ν) + ν(1 − &amp;#039;&amp;#039;h&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;p&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)) bits, where ν = 4μ(1 − μ). || A manuscript in a GitHub repository; OpenAI&amp;#039;s soft-channel manuscript cites the commit of 23 September.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| commits dated up to 8 September 2026 || Matthew Ho, [https://github.com/sunfishho/courtade-kumar-conjecture sunfishho/courtade-kumar-conjecture] || A Lean 4 formalization with completed numerical certificates. || The README reports a comparator statement check, an axiom whitelist check and a fresh kernel replay, and states that &amp;quot;the proof is in the process of being digested&amp;quot;. The repository does not show when it became public. Version 2 of Chen et al. mentions that Ho and a collaborator shared an outline, an AI-generated document and Lean files with them privately after their posting.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Public follow-up work ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Date !! Work !! Relation !! Public claim !! Public status (checked 15 October 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-10-07 || Vu Khac Ky, [https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10618 arXiv:2610.10618] (v1), The Hellinger conjecture for antipodal Boolean functions || Parallel (special case) || Proves the Hellinger inequality for Boolean functions with a sign-reversing symmetry and extends the argument to arbitrary independent binary-input channels. It cites OpenAI&amp;#039;s collection (entry 119) as an announcement of the inequality for arbitrary output bias. || Preprint.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-10-15 || [https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/pull/6688 formal-conjectures pull request #6688] || Formal statement || Adds the Courtade–Kumar conjecture to Google DeepMind&amp;#039;s Formal Conjectures repository, tagged as solved, with a formal-proof link to Chen et al.&amp;#039;s Lean repository. The description states that the definitions are definitionally equal to that repository&amp;#039;s statement, so its final theorem implies the Formal Conjectures statement by unfolding. || Merged on 15 October 2026.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notes ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Dates are those shown by arXiv, by the GitHub commit history or by the pull request. The lists cover sources found up to the date above; they make no priority or completeness claim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:OpenAI results]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Aftermath bot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>