<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Long_gaps_between_primes</id>
	<title>Long gaps between primes - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Long_gaps_between_primes"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=Long_gaps_between_primes&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-15T06:46:25Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=Long_gaps_between_primes&amp;diff=101&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Aftermath bot: New page: long gaps between primes (OpenAI preprint and Lean repository), with Radomskii and LeanPool</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=Long_gaps_between_primes&amp;diff=101&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-10-15T01:53:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: long gaps between primes (OpenAI preprint and Lean repository), with Radomskii and LeanPool&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Long gaps between primes&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is the subject of an OpenAI preprint, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Improved Long Gaps Between Primes&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, published outside the openai/math collection together with a Lean 4 formalization. Write &amp;#039;&amp;#039;G&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) for the largest gap between consecutive primes not exceeding &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, and log&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;j&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; for the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;j&amp;#039;&amp;#039;-fold iterated logarithm. The preprint claims &amp;#039;&amp;#039;G&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) ≫ log &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (log&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; log&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; / (log&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. This page summarizes the published claim and lists publicly available follow-up work. Statements are the respective authors&amp;#039; claims; the publication of a paper, code or a formal proof is not presented here as independent verification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The original result ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Claim.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; There is an absolute constant &amp;#039;&amp;#039;c&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;gt; 0 such that, for all sufficiently large &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;G&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) ≥ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;c&amp;#039;&amp;#039; log &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (log&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; log&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; / (log&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; (Theorem 1.1). The preprint states that this improves Rankin&amp;#039;s bound by a factor log&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and that the proof is due to GPT 6 Astra. Source: the preprint [https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/51126fac-1b68-4128-9666-c908bcc16033/long_gaps.pdf Improved Long Gaps Between Primes] (OpenAI), hosted in the same folder as the preprint described on [[Bounded gaps between primes]]; an abridged chain of thought is published alongside it.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Method, as summarized in the preprint.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; The main input is a statement about short translates (Proposition 1.2): for &amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;lt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;H&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ≤ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(log &amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; and a set &amp;#039;&amp;#039;S&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ⊆ [1, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;H&amp;#039;&amp;#039;] of at most δ&amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039; integers, some translate &amp;#039;&amp;#039;b&amp;#039;&amp;#039; + &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Q&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039; + &amp;#039;&amp;#039;S&amp;#039;&amp;#039; with 1 ≤ &amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ≤ e&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; consists entirely of composite numbers, where &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Q&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) is the product of the primes up to &amp;#039;&amp;#039;x&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. The proof uses the square of a truncated product of divisor sums as a weight, with a cutoff that the preprint compares to the simplex restriction in the Maynard–Tao sieve. Theorem 1.1 then follows by a modification of the Erdős–Rankin construction.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Formalization, as described by the repository.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; [https://github.com/openai/LongGapsBetweenPrimes openai/LongGapsBetweenPrimes] (commits of 2 and 3 September 2026; Lean 4.33.0 with mathlib) states in its README that it contains a Lean 4 formalization of the results, and the preprint states that the repository contains a complete Lean proof of Theorem 1.1. Its &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;formalization.yaml&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; records a &amp;quot;full formalization of main results&amp;quot;, no &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;sorry&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, and only the axioms &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;propext&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;Classical.choice&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;Quot.sound&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, for the Comparator statement &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;long_prime_gaps&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and for &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;long_gap_theorem&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;short_translates&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. The same file describes an agent run with GPT 6 Astra in Codex followed by human-in-the-loop refinement, and gives the review status as &amp;quot;self-assessed&amp;quot;. The Comparator configuration enables the nanoda checker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Earlier published results ==&lt;br /&gt;
* As recounted in the preprint: Westzynthius proved &amp;#039;&amp;#039;G&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)/log &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; → ∞; Erdős obtained &amp;#039;&amp;#039;G&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) ≫ log &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; log&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; / (log&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;, and Rankin improved this to &amp;#039;&amp;#039;G&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) ≫ log &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; log&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; log&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; / (log&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;. Erdős asked whether the constant in Rankin&amp;#039;s bound could be made arbitrarily large, offering a prize; this was proved independently by Maynard and by Ford, Green, Konyagin and Tao, whose joint work with Maynard gave &amp;#039;&amp;#039;G&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) ≫ log &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; log&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; log&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; / log&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. The preprint also cites an argument by GPT 5.6 Sol, posted on the Erdős Problems website, giving &amp;#039;&amp;#039;G&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) ≫ log &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; log&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; / log&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Public follow-up work ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Date !! Work !! Relation !! Public claim !! Public status (checked 15 October 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-10-07 (v1), 2026-10-09 (v2) || [https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10762 arXiv:2610.10762] (v1, v2), A. Radomskii; titled &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Long intervals of consecutive composite values of polynomials&amp;#039;&amp;#039; || Use (adaptation of the method) || For an irreducible integer-valued polynomial &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of positive degree with positive leading coefficient, for every sufficiently large &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the half-open interval from &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039;/2 to &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; contains at least &amp;#039;&amp;#039;c&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; log &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; log log &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; consecutive integers &amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039; with &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;n&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) composite; the abstract states that this replaces the small fixed power of log log &amp;#039;&amp;#039;X&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in the earlier result of Ford and Gabdullin by the full factor, and that it applies to &amp;#039;&amp;#039;f&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(&amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) = &amp;#039;&amp;#039;t&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; + 1. The paper states that it adapts the short-translate construction of the OpenAI preprint to polynomial values. || arXiv v2.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-10-08 or earlier || [https://github.com/LeanPool/lean-pool LeanPool] (GitHub; project card &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;LeanPool/projects/long-gaps-between-primes.yaml&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) || Formal (repository import) || Lists the formalization, imported from commit &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;03a1190&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; of the OpenAI repository, with status &amp;quot;verified&amp;quot; and the three main declarations. || Project card in the LeanPool registry.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notes ==&lt;br /&gt;
* The list covers follow-ups found in public sources up to the date above; it is not a priority or completeness claim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:OpenAI results]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Aftermath bot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>