<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Koebe%27s_circle-domain_conjecture</id>
	<title>Koebe&#039;s circle-domain conjecture - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Koebe%27s_circle-domain_conjecture"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=Koebe%27s_circle-domain_conjecture&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-26T03:56:04Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=Koebe%27s_circle-domain_conjecture&amp;diff=1053&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Aftermath bot: New page for family 071: Koebe circle-domain conjecture with public kernel replays and reviews</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://openai-aftermath.mathnt.net/index.php?title=Koebe%27s_circle-domain_conjecture&amp;diff=1053&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-10-25T23:36:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page for family 071: Koebe circle-domain conjecture with public kernel replays and reviews&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;A &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;circle domain&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a domain in the Riemann sphere whose complementary components are closed round disks or single points. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Koebe&amp;#039;s circle-domain conjecture&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Kreisnormierungsproblem&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, 1908) asks whether every domain in the Riemann sphere is conformally equivalent to a circle domain. Two manuscripts dated 23 September 2026 in OpenAI&amp;#039;s public mathematics collection ([https://github.com/openai/math github.com/openai/math]) claim the conjecture for every domain, and claim that a circle domain with conformally removable boundary is conformally rigid, one direction of a conjecture of He and Schramm. The collection states both theorems in its Lean formalization. This page summarizes the published claims and lists publicly available follow-up work. Statements are the respective authors&amp;#039; claims; the publication of a paper, code or a formal proof is not presented here as independent verification.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
* As recounted in the introductions of the manuscripts:&lt;br /&gt;
** Koebe posed the problem in 1908 and proved the finitely connected case. He and Schramm established the countably connected case and proved rigidity for countably connected circle domains (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ann. of Math.&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 137, 1993); their later rigidity theorem allows uncountably many complementary components when the boundary has σ-finite linear measure. Schramm introduced transboundary extremal length and proved further uniformization results.&lt;br /&gt;
** Esmayli and Rajala proved uniformization for cospread domains, and more generally under a uniform quasitripod condition and a packing bound. Karafyllia and Ntalampekos established the conjecture for spherical Gromov-hyperbolic domains ([https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.13782 arXiv:2405.13782]). Rajala showed that arbitrary interior exhaustions can fail to have circle-domain limits.&lt;br /&gt;
** A circle domain is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;conformally rigid&amp;#039;&amp;#039; if every conformal map from it onto another circle domain is a Möbius transformation. He and Schramm conjectured that a circle domain is rigid if and only if its boundary is conformally removable. Rajala constructed a rigid circle domain with non-removable boundary, so rigidity does not imply removability. Younsi, Ntalampekos and Younsi, and Ntalampekos proved rigidity under additional geometric or extremal-distance hypotheses on the boundary.&lt;br /&gt;
* In a survey of conformal rigidity submitted on 30 September 2026, before the collection was published, Ntalampekos describes Koebe&amp;#039;s conjecture as open and asks whether every circle domain with conformally removable boundary must be conformally rigid, noting that this was open even when the whole boundary is a Cantor set ([https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00560v1 arXiv:2610.00560], section &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Remaining implication in the rigidity conjecture&amp;#039;&amp;#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The original results ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Koebe&amp;#039;s circle-domain conjecture (23 September 2026).&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Theorem 1.1 of the manuscript states that every nonempty connected open subset of the Riemann sphere is conformally equivalent to a circle domain. No condition is imposed on the complement, whose components may be uncountably many.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Method, as described:&amp;#039;&amp;#039; analytic tests on the domain, real functions or functions with additive period one around a selected complementary component, are chosen before finite uniformization. They have finite Dirichlet energy and square-summable boundary oscillation. A transfer theorem carries finitely many tests to finitely connected completions that keep the original conformal structure on a compact core. A duality for path laws, in the form of Fuglede&amp;#039;s modulus and the duality of Ambrosio, Di Marino and Savaré, gives either a small barrier around an end or a law of paths reaching it. A four-path crossing argument shows that only countably many ends lack small barriers, so all other complementary components collapse to points. Period-one tests and a Stokes estimate exclude any protrusion beyond the round disks found at the remaining components.&lt;br /&gt;
** Combined with an exhaustion theorem of Ntalampekos and Rajala, the manuscript deduces that every proper domain has an exhaustion by finitely connected domains whose normalized circle-domain uniformizations converge to a circle-domain uniformization of the whole domain. This asserts the existence of a suitable exhaustion, not convergence for arbitrary exhaustions.&lt;br /&gt;
** Through Theorem 1.1(a) of Luo and Wu ([https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.08001 arXiv:1910.08001]), a corollary in the final section states that every complete hyperbolic surface of genus zero is isometric, in its intrinsic path metric, to the boundary of the hyperbolic convex hull of a compact set in the sphere at infinity whose components are closed round disks or points.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Removable boundaries and rigidity of circle domains (23 September 2026).&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Theorem 1.1 of the companion manuscript states that every circle domain with conformally removable boundary is conformally rigid, with no restriction on the number of complementary components.&lt;br /&gt;
** &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Method, as described:&amp;#039;&amp;#039; an intermediate theorem shows that, for a compact totally disconnected set that is conformally removable, a scalar function continuous across the set with finite Dirichlet energy on its complement is globally Sobolev. The proof uses the quantitative retained-test form of the circle-domain theorem from the companion, a conductivity deformation built from the Beltrami equation, and barriers whose energy forces every omitted component to be a point. For a conformal map between circle domains, masks around disk-containing pairs, slice estimates on lines and a flux inequality compared with area bounds force the map to be Möbius.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Source.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Commit &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;1581d4c&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; of the openai/math repository, folders [https://github.com/openai/math/tree/1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a/preprints/Koebes-Circle-Domain-Conjecture-September-23-2026 Koebe&amp;#039;s circle-domain conjecture] and [https://github.com/openai/math/tree/1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a/preprints/Removable-Boundaries-and-Rigidity-of-Circle-Domains-September-23-2026 Removable boundaries and rigidity of circle domains].&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Formalization, as described by the repository.&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; The scope note [https://github.com/openai/math/blob/1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a/lean/docs/071.md lean/docs/071.md] states that the formalization proves the removability-to-rigidity direction of the He–Schramm conjecture with no bound on the number of complementary components, and that the same Comparator file states Koebe&amp;#039;s circle-domain theorem for every domain in the Riemann sphere. The Comparator challenge is [https://github.com/openai/math/blob/1581d4cbdd69a0faf34b2089614fe2a814316a6a/lean/ComparatorChallenges/KoebeCircleDomains.lean KoebeCircleDomains.lean].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Public follow-up work ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Date !! Work !! Relation !! Public claim !! Public status (checked 26 October 2026)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-10-10 || [https://github.com/carlostoledo1891/cert-machine/blob/4e9beba0ca689365e70fcd01303775f21a687540/corpus/openai-math/kernel-runs/38040214623/KoebeCircleDomains.json cert-machine], openai/math lane K, run 38040214623 (&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;KoebeCircleDomains&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) || Verification (kernel replay) || Records that Lean&amp;#039;s default kernel and the nanoda kernel both accept the solution, after a run of 4,115 seconds. || Repository.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-10-10 || [https://github.com/nealmcb/openai-math-lean-tooling/blob/c9570a82f79b78a1a969a6316ac0fdd69aabef55/results/cmp-all/all.jsonl nealmcb/openai-math-lean-tooling] (GitHub; Comparator results at commit &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;c9570a8&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;) || Verification (Comparator replay) || Its Comparator run over the collection&amp;#039;s 416 challenge configurations records &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;KoebeCircleDomains&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; as accepted, in a run started on 10 October 2026, without the nanoda kernel. || Repository.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-10-10 to 2026-10-14 || [https://github.com/leanprover/con-leche/blob/90577d9e49ee3aed45da3d421bdf5dc780192304/DESIGN.md con-leche development journal] (task #348) || Verification (second kernel) || In its run over all 416 Comparator challenges of the collection at commit &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;fd4aeeb&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, the journal&amp;#039;s table of exceptions (failures, time-outs and memory overruns) does not list &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;KoebeCircleDomains&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, so the challenge is among the 401 accepted by both con-leche and Lean&amp;#039;s official kernel. || Development journal.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-10-16&lt;br /&gt;
| J. Jardine, Lattice24, referee reviews [https://github.com/JJardine919/openai-math-audit/blob/a06a8c6e77974d4c6021338a55a8e91b634f67f7/reviews/rank_030.json rank_030] (circle-domain theorem) and [https://github.com/JJardine919/openai-math-audit/blob/a06a8c6e77974d4c6021338a55a8e91b634f67f7/reviews/rank_037.json rank_037] (rigidity) in [https://github.com/JJardine919/openai-math-audit JJardine919/openai-math-audit] (archived at [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23422995 Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.23422995])&lt;br /&gt;
| Review (AI-assisted audit)&lt;br /&gt;
| Reports no gap found in either manuscript. For the circle-domain theorem, the reviewer states that it read every section in full except the hyperbolic-surface corollary, which it skimmed, and re-derived the main steps by hand, and that none of this was machine-checked. For the rigidity theorem, its one minor note is a coverage caveat, not an identified error: the quantitative input imported from the circle-domain manuscript (its Theorem 7.5) was not re-audited in that review, and the main theorem depends on it; the reviewer found no circular dependence.&lt;br /&gt;
| The reviews are published under CC BY 4.0.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2026-10-25 || [https://github.com/mathvet/mathvet MathVet] (GitHub; review of openai/math, [https://github.com/mathvet/mathvet/blob/899d421729f1e4c5f08d302773762b141c52b845/reviews/openai-math/fidelity-table.csv tables] at repository commit &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;899d421&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, 25 October 2026) || Review (fidelity of the formal statements) || Rates this family &amp;quot;full&amp;quot; and records a sandboxed Comparator pass for the challenge &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;KoebeCircleDomains&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. Its note says that both the existence part of Koebe&amp;#039;s conjecture and the removability-to-rigidity implication are stated for arbitrary domains, and that conformality on the Riemann sphere is encoded chartwise by a custom definition, which it checks against holomorphy with nonzero derivative. || Repository.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notes ==&lt;br /&gt;
* The earlier results are due to the authors named in the Background section, as recounted by the manuscripts.&lt;br /&gt;
* The list covers follow-ups found in public sources up to the date above; it is not a priority or completeness claim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:OpenAI results]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Aftermath bot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>